Rain has a strange way of sharpening a crowd. During the last Iloilo march, the skies surrendered just as the chants reached their peak. In seconds, everyone was soaked—jackets clinging like cold towels, shoes filling with brown water. Yet not one student behind me stopped chanting. If anything, the storm made them louder, as if nature itself had joined the protest. And there, right beside us, a young mother tightened her grip on her child with one arm while lifting a placard with the other. She stood her ground, trembling slightly, but unmoved. It was a reminder that protests are not mainly about slogans—they are about people who show up carrying burdens they did not create.
A priest leaned over to shield a farmer from Leganes with his umbrella, sharing both shade and solidarity. A tricycle driver kept yelling “Ibalik ang ninakaw!” until his voice cracked like wet gravel. None of them looked extraordinary, yet all of them were. These were people whose homes flooded last month, whose salaries had shrunk against rising prices, whose children studied in leaking classrooms, whose futures were trimmed by decisions made in offices they would never see. The November 30 “Trillion Peso March” grows from these quiet frustrations—small, stubborn acts of people who finally decide that enough is really enough.
The significance of this march has nothing to do with the projected six-digit participants, the LED walls, the sturdy platforms, or the logistical choreography prepared by the organizers. Its weight lies in something quieter: accountability as a basic right. Teachers, health workers, barangay staff, tricycle drivers—people who automatically lose taxes every paycheck—simply want to know where their money goes. But year after year, reports tell a different story: the Philippines sits low in corruption rankings, and international institutions caution that a slice of every national budget quietly disappears before it reaches communities. That translates into flooded classrooms, nurses trudging through floodwater, farmers stranded because a “finished” bridge is still half concrete and half promise.
I once joined volunteers measuring a supposed flood-control wall in Iloilo. We stretched the tape measure along the structure, our hands still trembling from the uneven ground and the weight of what we suspected. The numbers did not lie—the wall stood shorter than what taxpayers had paid for. The dishonesty towered higher than the structure itself. You don’t need a law degree to understand why people march. You only need to count.
As Bonifacio Day approaches, many will recall only the long weekend. But the spirit of the day resonates deeply with today’s frustrations. Bonifacio pushed against systems that insisted ordinary Pinoys should know their place. More than a century later, people are still pushing—against half-finished flood controls, questionable appropriations, ghost projects, and political structures that demand trust without earning it. I once spoke with a grandmother whose grandson’s school flooded twice despite the supposed completion of a “flood-control improvement.” She wasn’t angry. She was bewildered. “Kon may budget, indi bala dapat makita ang obra?” That was not political theory. That was lived logic.
This clarity is what binds the diverse groups joining the November 30 protest—faith communities, student councils, artists, teachers’ unions, farmers, fisherfolks, public utility vehicle operators, young professionals, LGBTQ+ advocates, and OFWs who cannot attend but send messages of solidarity. In one past rally, teenagers gently handed their umbrellas to older marchers despite being drenched themselves. One boy from Molo whispered, “Damo pa sila nabuhat para sa amon antes kami natawo (They have done so much for us long before we were even born.).” Gratitude and responsibility—that combination fuels today’s youth. No one had to tell them that corruption steals from their future. They already feel it in tuition hikes, scholarship shortages, and the slow crumbling of public services.
Critics argue that rallies accomplish nothing. History disagrees. EDSA was not predictable. The Million People March was not expected. Even small barangay protests—over water, electricity, or school repairs—have forced local governments to act. What makes the white-ribbon inspired November 30 march different is the timing: the government itself has admitted that corruption has started to erode taxpayer morale and weaken institutional trust. Experts like Atty. Olivier Aznar argue that outrage must turn into reform: transparent procurement, citizen monitoring, accountability across political colors. Supporters are pushing to revive the more rationalized Anti-Dynasty Bill—an idea long shelved but never irrelevant.
But the march is not just about policy. It is also about people whose stories rarely reach headlines. A mother under the rain is not trying to be symbolic—she is simply living through the consequences of bad governance. A pedicab/sikad driver shouting beside her is not performing—he is pleading for a drainage system that doesn’t drown his livelihood. Teachers who march are not seeking attention—they are tired of turning their own towels into mop cloths after every storm. Ordinary Pinoys pay some of the highest taxes relative to income in Southeast Asia, yet receive some of the most uneven public services. It is unfair to demand integrity from those who have so little while excusing those who misused billions.
There is also a quiet emotional culture inside these rallies—one built not on anger but on dignity. You see it when strangers steady elderly marchers along slippery pavements. You see it when protesters pause to clear the way for ambulances. You see it in witty placards that soften the heaviness of the moment: “Drain the drains, not funds,” “Pag-asa, hindi pa-asa,” and the now-classic chant “Ikulong na ‘yan (lahat na), mga kurakot!” Humor becomes both shield and mirror—a reminder that Filipinos can fight for justice without losing their humanity.
In the end, the worth of the November 30 Trillion Peso Protest won’t be measured by how many people fill the streets, but by what we do after. Movements live only when we stay curious—when we keep asking hard questions, checking budgets, demanding receipts, backing whistleblowers, and refusing to go numb just because corruption has become routine.
I keep remembering those students who, drenched from the sudden downpour, still lifted their umbrellas toward strangers that rainy afternoon. No grand speeches. No celebrities. No drama. Just one Filipino refusing to let another Filipino stand alone in the rain.
That, to me, is the heart of this protest.
If corruption steals quietly, then accountability must speak calmly, steadily, and together.
And maybe—just maybe—if enough of us stand side by side this Sunday, whether under sun or storm, even the thickest mud of our politics might finally start to wash away.
Doc H fondly describes himself as a “student of and for life” who, like many others, aspires to a life-giving and why-driven world grounded in social justice and the pursuit of happiness. His views do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions he is employed or connected with.
