With just one or two prompts, you can generate AI-created images for logos, posters, advertisements, and many other creative projects. With another two or three prompts, you can refine the output to achieve the artistic elements, design, and overall message you want to convey to your audience. Commonly used applications include ChatGPT, Canva, Picsart, and PhotoRoom. These tools have not only made layout design more convenient in this modern age, but they have also helped countless people improve productivity, create customized designs, reduce costs, and unlock greater creativity. Furthermore, research shows that AI applications contribute not only to the creation of publicity materials but also play vital roles in education, business, medicine, and many other fields, helping solve complex problems in modern society.
However, despite these visible contributions, a significant number of people—especially those in the field of art, where years of intensive training and professional practice have been devoted to personal expression, passion, and creativity—continue to debate the use of AI. Some artists express concern that the rise of AI-generated art may diminish the recognition of the skill, effort, and expertise required to create artwork by hand. Critics also point out that AI image generators are trained on vast collections of existing artworks and can produce designs that closely resemble the styles of human artists, raising important questions about originality, creativity, and intellectual property rights.
Experts view the ethical use of AI as treating it as a creative aid rather than a substitute for human artistry. They encourage users to avoid directly imitating existing artists and to ensure originality while respecting copyright in AI-generated works.
As an entrepreneur and a mother who constantly juggles multiple responsibilities, balancing my time while maintaining the same level of dedication to everything I do is extremely important. Before these applications existed, I had to design every advertising material myself or hire a team to do it. Today, AI allows me to save both time and money. More importantly, I can create and publish multiple publicity materials within minutes. For me, choosing efficiency is choosing an opportunity to focus on other responsibilities that matter just as much.
On the other hand, I paint. I enjoy loose watercolor and mural painting. Finishing a piece of artwork gives me a unique sense of fulfillment. I create art for its own sake—for the joy of expressing myself. It helps me unwind after a long day and brings me genuine peace.
AI, on the other hand, serves a different purpose in my life. I use it for practical reasons—for business, work, and earning a living. It helps me save time, support my family, and even extend help to others.
I believe these realities demonstrate that traditional art and AI can coexist without diminishing one another.
AI can never replace a truly remarkable work of art. To me, that is beyond debate. However, appreciating professional and creative artistry does not justify condemning AI when reality has shown that time passes in the blink of an eye. If technology allows us to work more efficiently while preserving our appreciation for authentic human creativity, then perhaps the question is not whether AI and art can coexist—but whether we are willing to embrace both responsibly.
